In brief
An Israeli judgment is not automatically enforced in the European Union: automatic recognition under the Brussels I Recast Regulation applies only to judgments of Member States, so each country examines an Israeli judgment under its own law, usually in proceedings for a declaration of enforceability. The 2019 Hague Judgments Convention has been in force in the EU since September 2023, but Israel only signed it in 2021 and it is not in force with respect to Israel. An arbitral award, by contrast, is enforced under the New York Convention, to which Israel and all EU Member States are party, and in Israel a foreign judgment is enforced under the Foreign Judgments Enforcement Law, 5718-1958, by an application filed as a rule within five years.
Key takeaways
- 1The Brussels I Recast Regulation grants recognition and enforcement without any special procedure only to judgments of Member States (Articles 36 and 39); an Israeli judgment is examined under the law of each country.
- 2The 2019 Hague Convention has been in force in the EU (except Denmark) since September 1, 2023; Israel signed on March 3, 2021 and has not ratified, so the Convention does not apply to Israeli judgments.
- 3The New York Convention: Israel ratified on January 5, 1959 (in force from June 7, 1959), and all 27 EU Member States are party to it.
- 4In Israel: a foreign judgment will be declared enforceable if the conditions of section 3 of the Foreign Judgments Enforcement Law are met, subject to reciprocity (section 4) and defences (section 6).
- 5An application to enforce a foreign judgment in Israel is filed within 5 years of the date of the judgment, unless there is a different agreement or special reasons (section 5).
An Israeli company that has won a judgment against a foreign party often discovers that winning is only half the way: the money is abroad, and the judgment must go through another procedure before a bailiff there will act on it. This guide explains what happens to an Israeli judgment in Europe, how an arbitral award is enforced, and what the rules are in the opposite direction, when a foreign party wants to enforce a judgment against an Israeli company in Israel. The legal position is current as of November 2026.
Is an Israeli judgment automatically enforced in the European Union?
No. The Brussels I Recast Regulation (1215/2012) provides that a judgment given in a Member State is recognised in the other Member States without any special procedure (Article 36), and is enforceable there without a declaration of enforceability (Article 39). This rule applies only to judgments of Member States. An Israeli judgment is a judgment of a third country, so each EU country examines it under its national law and the treaties to which it is party.
In practice, in most countries an Israeli judgment goes through a procedure known in Europe as exequatur: an application to a local court to recognise the judgment and declare it enforceable. The court does not re-hear the dispute itself, but checks conditions such as the finality of the judgment, the jurisdiction of the Israeli court, the defendant's right to defend, public policy and sometimes reciprocity.
| Country | The route for an Israeli judgment (in brief) | Detailed guide |
|---|---|---|
| Romania | Recognition and enforcement under the Code of Civil Procedure (Articles 1095-1096), subject among other things to reciprocity | A commercial dispute in Romania |
| Bulgaria | A claim before the Sofia City Court under the Private International Law Code | A commercial dispute in Bulgaria |
| Greece | A declaration of enforceability under Article 905 of the Code of Civil Procedure | A commercial dispute in Greece |
| Italy | Recognition under Article 64 of Law 218/1995; for compulsory enforcement, an application to the Court of Appeal | A commercial dispute in Italy |
| Portugal | Confirmation (revisão e confirmação) before the Court of Appeal | A commercial dispute in Portugal |
| Cyprus | No treaty with Israel; a new action based on the judgment under common law | A commercial dispute in Cyprus |
| USA (not in the EU) | Under the law of each state, in most under a uniform act on the recognition of foreign judgments | A commercial dispute in the US |
What do recognition and enforcement proceedings for an Israeli judgment in Europe look like?
The details vary between countries, but the structure is similar: file an application with the competent court in the country where the assets are, attach the documents, and after the declaration turn to the local enforcement authorities. In Romania, for example, after recognition an application to a bailiff (executor judecătoresc) is required to attach accounts or assets.
- A certified copy of the judgment and confirmation that it is final and no longer subject to appeal, according to the requirements of the requested country.
- Proof that the defendant was duly summoned and given an opportunity to defend, especially for a judgment given in default.
- An apostille on the Israeli documents: Israel has been a party to the Hague Convention Abolishing the Requirement of Legalisation since 1978, and all EU Member States are party to it.
- A certified translation into the language of the local court.
- An application by a local lawyer, who also checks the reciprocity question and the deadlines in the requested country.
- Actual enforcement under local law, once the declaration has become final.
When the other party's assets are in a single EU country, suing there directly or arbitration usually saves this entire stage. Deciding where to sue is also deciding how to enforce, so it is best made already in the contract. See governing law and jurisdiction clause in an international contract.

Does the 2019 Hague Judgments Convention apply to Israel?
No, as of November 2026. According to the Hague Conference status table, Israel signed the Convention on March 3, 2021, but has not ratified it, so it is not in force with respect to Israel. The Convention applies only between states in both of which it is in force, so an Israeli judgment does not benefit from it in Europe, and a European judgment does not benefit from it in Israel.
| Party to the Convention | Entry into force |
|---|---|
| The European Union (all Member States except Denmark) | September 1, 2023 |
| Ukraine | September 1, 2023 |
| Uruguay | October 1, 2024 |
| United Kingdom | July 1, 2025 |
| Albania and Montenegro | March 1, 2026 |
| Andorra | June 1, 2026 |
| Israel | Signed on March 3, 2021; not in force |
| USA | Signed on March 2, 2022; not in force |
Israel also signed the 2005 Hague Convention on Choice of Court Agreements on the same day and has not ratified it, so a jurisdiction clause choosing an Israeli court does not receive that Convention's protection in Europe. It is worth following the Hague Conference status tables, because a future ratification will change the picture.
How is an arbitral award enforced abroad?
Under the 1958 New York Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards. Israel signed it on June 10, 1958, ratified it on January 5, 1959 and it has been in force for Israel since June 7, 1959, without reservations. All 27 EU Member States are party to the Convention, and 172 states in total according to the UNCITRAL status table. Some states, including Romania, declared that they will apply the Convention only to awards made in states party to it and only to commercial relationships, but Israel is a party, and a dispute between companies is usually commercial.
The party seeking enforcement submits the arbitral award and the arbitration agreement, in the original or a certified copy, with a translation where necessary. The court may refuse only on the grounds defined in Article V of the Convention:
- Incapacity of a party, or an arbitration agreement that is not valid under the law applicable to it.
- The party against whom enforcement is sought was not given proper notice of the appointment of the arbitrator or of the proceedings, or was unable to present its case.
- The award goes beyond the scope of the arbitration agreement.
- The composition of the tribunal or the procedure was not in accordance with the parties' agreement or with the law of the seat of arbitration.
- The award is not yet binding, or has been set aside or suspended in the country in which, or under the law of which, it was made.
- The subject matter is not capable of settlement by arbitration under the law of the requested country, or enforcement would be contrary to its public policy.
In Israel, an application to confirm or set aside a foreign arbitral award to which a convention that Israel is party to applies is heard in accordance with the provisions of the convention (section 29A of the Arbitration Law, 5728-1968), and alongside this, regulations were enacted for implementing the New York Convention (Foreign Arbitration), 5738-1978.
How is a foreign judgment enforced in Israel?
Under the Foreign Judgments Enforcement Law, 5718-1958, which provides that a foreign judgment shall not be enforced in Israel except under it (section 2). The court may declare a foreign judgment enforceable if four conditions are met (section 3): it was given in a state whose courts were competent to give it under its laws, it is no longer appealable, the obligation in it is enforceable under the laws of enforcement in Israel and its content is not contrary to public policy, and it is executable in the state in which it was given.
| Issue | What the Law provides |
|---|---|
| Reciprocity (section 4) | A judgment will not be declared enforceable if it was given in a state whose laws do not enforce Israeli judgments; the Attorney General may request enforcement even without reciprocity |
| Time limit (section 5) | An application filed more than five years after the date of the judgment will not be heard, unless otherwise agreed between Israel and the foreign state or there are special reasons |
| Defences (section 6) | Fraud, lack of a reasonable opportunity to defend, lack of jurisdiction under the rules of private international law applicable in Israel, conflict with another valid judgment, and pending proceedings in Israel on the same matter |
| Sovereignty and security (section 7) | A judgment will not be declared enforceable if its enforcement is likely to prejudice the sovereignty or security of Israel |
| After the declaration (section 10) | It has the status of an Israeli judgment for execution purposes; an obligation in foreign currency is paid in ILS at the exchange rate on the day of payment, or in the same currency |
| Recognition (section 11) | Recognition of a foreign judgment under an agreement with a foreign state, or incidental recognition in another matter if the court considers it just and proper to do so |
There is an important point here for an Israeli company sued abroad: under section 6(b), merely appearing before the foreign court to contest its jurisdiction, to request a stay in favour of arbitration or to protect seized assets is not considered consent to its jurisdiction. But ignoring a claim abroad is a risk, because a default judgment may be enforced in a country where the company has assets.
A judgment or an arbitral award: which is easier to enforce abroad?
Usually an arbitral award, because of the New York Convention and its narrow grounds for refusal. But arbitration is a decision made in the contract, before the dispute, and it has its own costs.
| Israeli judgment | Arbitral award | |
|---|---|---|
| Basis for enforcement in the EU | The national law of each country | The New York Convention, in all 27 countries |
| 2019 Hague Convention | Does not apply (Israel has not ratified) | Not relevant |
| Reciprocity | Examined in some countries | Relevant only under reservations to the Convention, and Israel is a party |
| Review on the merits | Usually not | No; only the Article V grounds |
| Cost at the proceedings stage | Court fees | Institutional fees and arbitrators' fees |
How to frame this decision in advance in the contract is explained in the guide to governing law, jurisdiction and arbitration clauses, and on a dispute with a real estate developer see A dispute with a developer abroad: arbitration or court.
What to check before suing in Israel a party whose assets are abroad?
- Where the assets are and in which country enforcement will be required.
- How that country recognises Israeli judgments: a treaty, reciprocity, conditions and deadlines.
- Whether there is an arbitration clause or jurisdiction clause that determines the forum.
- Whether proper service abroad is possible: defective service is a common ground for refusal.
- What the total cost is: proceedings in Israel, followed by recognition proceedings, translations and enforcement abroad.
- Whether urgent interim relief is needed in the country of the assets right now.
What to do now, and how we accompany it
Before suing, and certainly before trying to enforce a judgment abroad, it is worth mapping the country where the assets are and its rules for recognising Israeli judgments and arbitral awards. Our office in Ness Ziona helps Israeli companies examine the enforcement route, prepare the judgment documents for use abroad and coordinate the proceedings with lawyers licensed in the requested country. Meetings in Bucharest are possible by prior arrangement.
This guide is general information as of November 2026 and is not legal advice for a specific case. The status of treaties changes with new ratifications, and every enforcement application is examined under the law of the relevant country and by a lawyer qualified there.
Frequently asked questions
Is an Israeli judgment valid in Europe?
Not automatically. Automatic recognition under the Brussels I Recast Regulation applies only to judgments of EU Member States. An Israeli judgment must go through recognition and enforcement proceedings under the law of each country where enforcement is sought.
Has Israel signed the 2019 Hague Convention on the enforcement of judgments?
Israel signed the Convention on March 3, 2021, but has not ratified it, so as of November 2026 it is not in force with respect to Israel. The Convention has been in force in the European Union, except Denmark, since September 1, 2023, but applies only between states in both of which it is in force.
How is an Israeli arbitral award enforced in Romania or another EU country?
Under the New York Convention, to which Israel and all EU Member States are party. The award and the arbitration agreement are submitted to the competent court, with a translation. The court does not re-hear the dispute and can refuse only on the grounds in Article V of the Convention, such as lack of opportunity to defend or conflict with public policy.
Within what time must enforcement of a foreign judgment be sought in Israel?
Under section 5 of the Foreign Judgments Enforcement Law, the court will not entertain an application filed more than five years after the date of the judgment, unless a different period has been agreed between Israel and the foreign state or it finds special reasons for the delay.
What are the conditions for enforcing a foreign judgment in Israel?
Under section 3 of the Law: the judgment was given by a competent court under the law of its state, it is no longer appealable, it is enforceable under the laws of enforcement in Israel and is not contrary to public policy, and it is executable in the state where it was given. In addition, reciprocity is required (section 4), and the defendant has defences such as fraud (section 6).
What is exequatur?
A procedure in which a local court declares that a foreign judgment is recognised and enforceable in its country. The court checks formal and substantive conditions, such as finality, jurisdiction and in some countries reciprocity, but as a rule does not re-hear the substance of the dispute.
Is it wise to ignore a claim against the company abroad?
Usually not. A default judgment may be enforced in a country where the company has assets. In Israel, under section 6(b) of the Law, appearing only to contest jurisdiction or to request a stay in favour of arbitration is not considered consent to the foreign court's jurisdiction.
Read next · 10 min readPermanent Establishment and a Remote Employee Abroad: When an Israeli Company Is Taxable in the Employee's Country, and What About Payroll and Social SecurityAn employee working from home abroad may create a permanent establishment for an Israeli company. Fixed place, dependent agent, building site, OECD 2025 home office update, payroll.Read the guideSources
- Foreign Judgments Enforcement Law, 5718-1958 (Wikisource, Hebrew, with links to Reshumot)
- Arbitration Law, 5728-1968 (Wikisource, Hebrew)
- EUR-Lex - Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 (Brussels I bis)
- HCCH - Status table, Judgments Convention (2019)
- HCCH - Status table, Choice of Court Convention (2005)
- HCCH - Status table, Apostille Convention (1961)
- UNCITRAL - Status of the New York Convention (1958)
- UNCITRAL - Text of the New York Convention (PDF)









