Ilan Leibovitch & Co.Lawyer and real estate developer

The tenant paid every month. So why did the yield disappear?

June 6, 2026 · Adv. Ilan Leibovitch

Oren called me with a question that sounded innocent.

“Ilan, I don't understand. The apartment is rented, the tenant pays, there are no problems. So why, when I do the math at the end of the year, am I earning half of what they promised me?”

I knew the tone. It isn't the tone of someone who fell victim to fraud. It's the tone of someone for whom everything worked, on paper, and yet something leaked out without his seeing it.

Oren is a high-tech guy, forty-something. The kind who likes systems that run on their own. When he bought an investment apartment in Limassol, what drew him wasn't only the yield and not only the Cypriot sun. It was one sentence the marketer said to him, and which he later repeated to me almost word for word: “This is a passive investment. You buy, we manage, you get money into your account. You don't have to do anything.”

The word “anything” was the word Oren fell in love with.

You have to understand where he came from. Oren works crazy hours. He has two small kids, a mortgage in Israel, and a head that is already full to the brim. The idea of a property that produces money while he sleeps, without his having to add one more slot to the juggling act of his life, sounded to him like the closest thing to freedom that money can buy.

For him, “passive investment” was a simple promise: buy, sign with a management company, and forget. The money would simply appear. He didn't think of it as a business to be managed. He thought of it as a deposit that yields more than the bank.

So he signed a management agreement with a local company in Limassol. A monthly management fee, a percentage of the rent. It seemed reasonable. He handed over the keys, got word that the apartment was rented within three weeks, and went back to his life at full steam.

And indeed, the money came in. Every month, more or less on time.

So he stopped looking.

This is the point I see again and again, among very smart people. Not the moment when something blows up, but the quiet moment when an investor decides he no longer needs to look. Oren assumed that if the money was coming in, everything was fine. But “the money comes in” and “the investment is working as it should” simply are not the same thing.

There was one phone call that Oren told me about only afterwards, and when he told it he was already smiling in embarrassment.

One evening, the management company called him. A leaking tap in the kitchen, they said, they needed approval to order a plumber. Oren was in the middle of dinner with the kids. He answered with undisguised irritation: “Why are you even calling me? What did I take you on for? You're supposed to handle these things. Handle it.”

And hung up.

He was sure he had done the right thing. He had “delegated authority.” In his eyes, every call from the management company was a failure of the management company - if they do their job, why would they bother him at all? He didn't realize that call was exactly the moment when he should have said “wait, how much will it cost? Get me a quote.” Or maybe he did understand, somewhere in the back, and simply didn't want to. Because wanting to understand means getting involved again. And that is exactly what he paid not to be.

So he gave up the right to ask. And whoever gives up the right to ask also gives up the right to complain afterwards.

When we sat down together over the year's reports, the picture began to clear.

The management fees were higher than Oren remembered. Not because the contract had been changed, but because the contract included “ancillary fees” that he had never read closely: a fee on every repair, a fee for finding a new tenant, a fee for lease renewal. In one year he had two tenant changes. Each change brought a full brokerage fee for the management company, plus an interim period during which the apartment stood empty, for which he received not a cent.

And then there were the repairs. That same leaking tap. A boiler that broke down. Painting between tenants. Each one separately looked negligible. But it was the company that ordered the tradesmen, the company that approved the prices, and the company that charged a coordination fee on each one. Oren never asked for a competing quote. He simply wasn't there. He had disconnected himself from the conversation back that evening, at the dinner table.

When I put it all together - the management fees, the commissions, the periods the apartment stood empty, the repairs whose prices no one supervised, Oren's “passive” yield had shrunk by almost half of the figure presented to him when he bought.

There was no theft here. No one stole. Every euro was spent according to the contract Oren signed.

That's exactly the painful point. Oren didn't fall victim to fraud - he fell victim to an assumption. The assumption that “passive” means “I am released from responsibility.” But the passivity sold to him didn't really exist. No real estate investment is truly passive. You can hand the daily work to someone else - that's legitimate, even smart. But you can't hand off the responsibility. Someone still has to read the reports, ask why there were two tenant changes in a year, request a second quote for the boiler, decide whether the management fee is still fair. When Oren got angry at the phone call that evening, he didn't give up effort. He gave up control.

I put it to him roughly like this: a management company is a tool. A good tool, sometimes essential. But a tool without a hand guiding it works for itself, not for you. The leaking tap wasn't the problem. The problem was that he saw the phone call as a nuisance, instead of seeing it as the real work that every property abroad requires.

The difference between an investment that works and one that bleeds slowly is usually not the quality of the property. Sometimes it is only whether someone is looking, and whether he is willing to answer the phone.

I helped Oren redraft the management agreement. A cap on fees. A duty to obtain a competing quote above a certain amount. An orderly quarterly report instead of a blind monthly transfer. His yield didn't jump miraculously. But the leak was closed, both the tap's and the one in the reports.

He said to me at the end: “I thought I'd bought peace of mind. In fact I bought work that someone else does, but I still need to check it.”

That is exactly the right understanding.

If you are considering an investment abroad with a promise of “managed passive income,” don't be tempted by the word “passive.” Ask what exactly the management fees include and what they don't. Ask to see what a monthly report looks like. Ask who approves repairs and at what price. And when they call you in the evening about a leaking tap, don't be angry at the phone. It isn't a nuisance. It's your investment asking for one moment of your attention.

A good property in a good area is only half the equation. The other half is whoever looks after it, and whoever looks after the one who looks after it.

Stories are based on real situations, with identifying details changed. Not legal advice.

Translated from the Hebrew original. עברית

The full column on LinkedIn

All stories

Let’s start with a conversation.

A sound international transaction begins long before signing. A short introductory call will clarify whether, and how, we are the right firm to support you.

Office
7 Hanafat HaDegel St., Ness Ziona, Israel
Bucharest
Bucharest, Romania
  • Hebrew · Romanian · English
  • Tel Aviv · Bucharest
  • Online meetings